Editorial June

Edito

A few questions about the climate.

It is time we ask ourselves some fundamental questions at a time when ESG topics, now referred to as “sustainable”, are quickly gaining ground in the financial world.

We are seeing a major trend emerge: the instrumentalisation of finance in the broadest sense, with its corollary: the race for compliance on the part of those involved.

Thus, for European and national political authorities, which are the strongest advocates of sustainable finance, it is no longer time to deal with the why but only with the how.

In our opinion, the resulting issue is the loss of sight of the purpose of each segment of finance. By wanting to standardise everything, legislators and regulators are inclined to demand the same thing of those involved, regardless of their profession (bankers, insurers or asset managers).

« The clearly stated ‘higher’ objective, which is increasingly being imposed, including by legislation, is to ‘save the planet’. Who can be against it? No one, of course! »

Yannick Tatibouët

The problem with demanding everything at the same time – saving the planet, delivering financial performance and serving customers’ interests –– is that a problem of priority management emerges. The new doxa thinks it has solved the dilemma by saying that the customer’s ultimate interest is to save the planet. Sure! But timelines, objectives and expectations are not necessarily aligned.

The increasingly strong notion of “investment steering” is of concern when it comes to financial markets.

Let’s take the example of a management company. It is the only one that knows and should know the needs and expectations of its clients and has a direct or indirect mandate (through the management of a UCI) to do so.

We therefore question the relevance, legitimacy and effectiveness of the public authorities, in the broadest sense, turning themselves into asset beneficiaries with other people’s money. To each their own profession and priorities.

Another question is whether, in addition to compulsory levies, there will be compulsory savings or compulsory consumption?

To conclude on timelines, in relation to the asset management business, if we integrate the notion of long-term climate risk, the fact remains that the risk that will increase immediately is regulatory.

Written by
Yannick Tatibouët

Yannick Tatibouët
Executive director, Director of strategic intelligence, External relations, ESG and Research

June 30, 2021

Covéa Finance, a portfolio management company of the MAAF, MMA and GMF groups with share capital of €24 901 254, incorporated as a single-person simplified joint stock company, registered with the Paris Trade and Companies Register under number 407 625 607 and approved by the French Financial Markets Authority under number GP 97 007.

This document is produced for information only and cannot be considered as an offer to sell or investment advice. It does not constitute the basis for any commitment of any kind, nor a strategy assessment or any recommendation to invest in financial instruments. It contains general and non-personalized opinions and analyzes designed by Covéa Finance on the basis of figures that it considers reliable on the day of their establishment depending on the economic context, but the accuracy and validity of which are however not guaranteed. The views expressed in the document are subject to change without notice. Covéa Finance cannot be held responsible for any decision taken on the basis of information contained in this document. This document is the intellectual property of Covéa Finance. Any Use (defined below), reproduction or distribution of all or part of this document must be subject to the prior authorization of Covéa Finance. The recipient of this document is aware of and accepts that the quantified data, allowing the establishment of general and non-personalized opinions and analyzes, may be subject to the acquisition of rights vis-à-vis third parties. Therefore, the encrypted data may under no circumstances be the subject of any use by the recipient of the document without the prior acquisition of the necessary rights directly from the third party holders of these rights. Furthermore, the recipient of this document is aware and accepts that Covéa Finance will in no way be responsible for any use made of said encrypted data and will alone assume all the consequences vis-à-vis third parties who hold the rights associated with this data. "Use" is understood as, and without limitation, the manipulation of encrypted data, distribution, redistribution, integration into an information system or into documents of all types.